8. 参考文献
中文导读: 本节对应 RFC 9945 的 8. 参考文献 部分, 对应文档标题为 RFC 9945 - IETF 社区调解. 下方若包含英文 RFC 原文, 注册表名称, 字段名, 算法名, 对象标识符, 媒体类型, 邮箱地址, URL, 代码, ABNF, ASN.1, YANG, JSON, XML, 测试向量或参考文献条目, 均按规范原样保留, 因为这些内容需要与 RFC 文本, IANA 注册表, 实现代码或验证工具逐字一致. 中文段落用于说明本节的作用, 阅读重点和实现含义, 不改变任何协议语义或注册值.
本节是参考文献清单, 主要用于标明规范性引用和资料性引用的来源. 引用标签, RFC 编号, BCP/STD 编号, DOI, URL, 作者姓名和英文题名均是可检索的书目信息, 因此保持英文或原始格式. 阅读正文时, 带有规范性要求的行为应回到被引用文档中确认; 资料性引用则提供背景, 算法, 部署经验或相关技术说明.
本节列出本文档引用的规范性和资料性参考文献. 文献题名, 作者信息, DOI 和 URL 保持原始形式.
规范性参考文献描述 IETF 社区调解所依赖的制度基础, 包括 NomCom 和 recall 流程, Internet 标准流程, 工作组程序, IETF mission, 行为准则, 反骚扰流程以及 IETF 行政支持结构. 这些文献为调解过程中的角色边界, 程序正当性和社区行为期望提供依据.
资料性参考文献提供与邮件列表和讨论空间治理相关的背景, 包括反骚扰政策, 破坏性发帖声明, 垃圾邮件控制, 工作组邮件列表 moderation 指南, Ombudsteam, 撤销发帖权, 邮件列表管理更新, IETF rough consensus 文化以及 IETF Discussion List charter. 它们帮助读者理解本文档为什么把 moderation, disruption handling 和 community process 放在同一治理语境下.
8.1. 规范性参考文献
[BCP10] Best Current Practice 10, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp10. At the time of writing, this BCP comprises the following:
Kucherawy, M., Ed., Hinden, R., Ed., and J. Livingood,
Ed., "IAB, IESG, IETF Trust, and IETF LLC Selection,
Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the IETF
Nominating and Recall Committees", BCP 10, RFC 8713,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8713, February 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8713>.
Duke, M., "Nominating Committee Eligibility", BCP 10,
RFC 9389, DOI 10.17487/RFC9389, April 2023,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9389>.
[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2026.
[RFC2418] Bradner, S., "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 2418, DOI 10.17487/RFC2418, September 1998, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2418.
[RFC3935] Alvestrand, H., "A Mission Statement for the IETF", BCP 95, RFC 3935, DOI 10.17487/RFC3935, October 2004, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3935.
[RFC7154] Moonesamy, S., Ed., "IETF Guidelines for Conduct", BCP 54, RFC 7154, DOI 10.17487/RFC7154, March 2014, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7154.
[RFC7776] Resnick, P. and A. Farrel, "IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 7776, DOI 10.17487/RFC7776, March 2016, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7776.
[RFC8711] Haberman, B., Hall, J., and J. Livingood, "Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity, Version 2.0", BCP 101, RFC 8711, DOI 10.17487/RFC8711, February 2020, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8711.
8.2. 资料性参考文献
[AHP] IESG, "IETF Anti-Harassment Policy", 3 November 2013, <https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/anti- harassment-policy/>.
[DP] IESG, "IESG Statement on Disruptive Posting", 17 February 2006, <https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/ disruptive-posting/>.
[IESG-SPAM] IESG, "IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailing Lists", 14 April 2008, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ statement-iesg-iesg-statement-on-spam-control-on-ietf- mailing-lists-20080414/>.
[MODML] IESG, "IESG Guidance on the Moderation of IETF Working Group Mailing Lists", 29 August 2000, <https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/ mailing-lists-moderation/>.
[OT] "Ombudsteam", https://www.ietf.org/contact/ombudsteam/.
[RFC3552] Rescorla, E. and B. Korver, "Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations", BCP 72, RFC 3552, DOI 10.17487/RFC3552, July 2003, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3552.
[RFC3683] Rose, M., "A Practice for Revoking Posting Rights to IETF Mailing Lists", BCP 83, RFC 3683, DOI 10.17487/RFC3683, March 2004, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3683.
[RFC3934] Wasserman, M., "Updates to RFC 2418 Regarding the Management of IETF Mailing Lists", BCP 25, RFC 3934, DOI 10.17487/RFC3934, October 2004, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3934.
[RFC7282] Resnick, P., "On Consensus and Humming in the IETF", RFC 7282, DOI 10.17487/RFC7282, June 2014, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7282.
[RFC9245] Eggert, L. and S. Harris, "IETF Discussion List Charter", BCP 45, RFC 9245, DOI 10.17487/RFC9245, June 2022, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9245.