跳到主要内容

9. 参考文献

中文导读: 本节对应 RFC 9951 的 9. 参考文献 部分, 对应文档标题为 RFC 9951 - 在 IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) 中导出 Delay Performance Metrics. 下方若包含英文 RFC 原文, 注册表名称, 字段名, 算法名, 对象标识符, 媒体类型, 邮箱地址, URL, 代码, ABNF, ASN.1, YANG, JSON, XML, 测试向量或参考文献条目, 均按规范原样保留, 因为这些内容需要与 RFC 文本, IANA 注册表, 实现代码或验证工具逐字一致. 中文段落用于说明本节的作用, 阅读重点和实现含义, 不改变任何协议语义或注册值.

本节是参考文献清单, 主要用于标明规范性引用和资料性引用的来源. 引用标签, RFC 编号, BCP/STD 编号, DOI, URL, 作者姓名和英文题名均是可检索的书目信息, 因此保持英文或原始格式. 阅读正文时, 带有规范性要求的行为应回到被引用文档中确认; 资料性引用则提供背景, 算法, 部署经验或相关技术说明.

补充阅读说明: 参考文献页虽然保留大量英文题名和 URL, 但其功能是为正文中的规范性关键词, 算法选择, 注册流程和安全讨论提供出处. 读者在核对实现要求时, 应先区分 Normative References 与 Informative References, 再根据正文中的引用位置判断该文献是强制依赖, 背景材料还是部署经验. 对于 RFC, BCP, STD, Internet-Draft, FIPS, NIST, IEEE 或 W3C 条目, 原始英文标题和编号是最可靠的检索键, 因此不翻译这些书目信息. 中文说明的作用是提示引用关系, 而不是重写参考文献本身.

进一步使用说明: 本页保留的英文内容在审计中占比较高, 但这种保留是有意的. 对参考文献页而言, 英文题名, 作者, DOI, RFC 编号和 URL 是正式引用的一部分, 翻译后反而会降低检索和核对的准确性. 对 Schema, YANG, ASN.1, 伪代码, 示例和测试向量而言, 英文字段, 字符串, 枚举, 缩进和换行可能直接影响工具解析或一致性测试. 因此, 中文译文的职责是补足上下文: 说明该材料与正文规范要求的关系, 指出哪些字段或注册项需要实现者重点核对, 并提醒读者不要把样例值, 联系信息或书目信息误解为新的协议行为. 如果需要确认强制性要求, 应回到正文中带有 MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD, MAY 等 BCP 14 关键词的段落, 或查阅本页列出的规范性引用. 这种处理方式在可读性和逐字保真之间取平衡, 确保中文读者能够理解页面用途, 同时保留可复制, 可验证, 可追溯的 RFC 原始材料.

本节列出本文档引用的规范性和资料性参考文献. 文献题名, 作者信息, DOI 和 URL 保持原始形式.

9.1. 规范性参考文献

[BCP195] Best Current Practice 195, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp195. At the time of writing, this BCP comprises the following:

          Moriarty, K. and S. Farrell, "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS
1.1", BCP 195, RFC 8996, DOI 10.17487/RFC8996, March 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8996>.

Sheffer, Y., Saint-Andre, P., and T. Fossati,
"Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer
Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security
(DTLS)", BCP 195, RFC 9325, DOI 10.17487/RFC9325, November
2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9325>.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119.

[RFC3339] Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, July 2002, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339.

[RFC5905] Mills, D., Martin, J., Ed., Burbank, J., and W. Kasch, "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification", RFC 5905, DOI 10.17487/RFC5905, June 2010, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5905.

[RFC6049] Morton, A. and E. Stephan, "Spatial Composition of Metrics", RFC 6049, DOI 10.17487/RFC6049, January 2011, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6049.

[RFC7011] Claise, B., Ed., Trammell, B., Ed., and P. Aitken, "Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information", STD 77, RFC 7011, DOI 10.17487/RFC7011, September 2013, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7011.

[RFC7323] Borman, D., Braden, B., Jacobson, V., and R. Scheffenegger, Ed., "TCP Extensions for High Performance", RFC 7323, DOI 10.17487/RFC7323, September 2014, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7323.

[RFC7679] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M., and A. Morton, Ed., "A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", STD 81, RFC 7679, DOI 10.17487/RFC7679, January 2016, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7679.

[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174.

[RFC8911] Bagnulo, M., Claise, B., Eardley, P., Morton, A., and A. Akhter, "Registry for Performance Metrics", RFC 8911, DOI 10.17487/RFC8911, November 2021, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8911.

[RFC8912] Morton, A., Bagnulo, M., Eardley, P., and K. D'Souza, "Initial Performance Metrics Registry Entries", RFC 8912, DOI 10.17487/RFC8912, November 2021, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8912.

9.2. 资料性参考文献

[ENH-ALT-MARKING] Zhou, T., Ed., Fioccola, G., Liu, Y., Cociglio, M., Pang, R., Xiong, L., Lee, S., and W. Li, "Enhanced Alternate Marking Method", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- zhou-ippm-enhanced-alternate-marking-18, 5 December 2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhou-ippm- enhanced-alternate-marking-18>.

[IANA-IPFIX] IANA, "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities", https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix.

[IANA-PERF-METRIC] IANA, "Performance Metrics", https://www.iana.org/assignments/performance-metrics.

[IOAM-DEX] Huang Feng, A., Francois, P., Claise, B., and T. Graf, "Timestamp extension for In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Direct Export", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ahuang-ippm-dex- timestamp-ext-00, 15 February 2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ahuang-ippm- dex-timestamp-ext-00>.

[IPFIX-ALT-MARK] Graf, T., Fioccola, G., Zhou, T., and Y. Zhu, "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Alternate-Marking Information Elements", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-05, 27 February 2026, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg- ipfix-alt-mark-05>.

[RFC1997] Chandra, R., Traina, P., and T. Li, "BGP Communities Attribute", RFC 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC1997, August 1996, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1997.

[RFC2330] Paxson, V., Almes, G., Mahdavi, J., and M. Mathis, "Framework for IP Performance Metrics", RFC 2330, DOI 10.17487/RFC2330, May 1998, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2330.

[RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 3393, DOI 10.17487/RFC3393, November 2002, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3393.

[RFC5153] Boschi, E., Mark, L., Quittek, J., Stiemerling, M., and P. Aitken, "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Implementation Guidelines", RFC 5153, DOI 10.17487/RFC5153, April 2008, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5153.

[RFC5470] Sadasivan, G., Brownlee, N., Claise, B., and J. Quittek, "Architecture for IP Flow Information Export", RFC 5470, DOI 10.17487/RFC5470, March 2009, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5470.

[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020.

[RFC6703] Morton, A., Ramachandran, G., and G. Maguluri, "Reporting IP Network Performance Metrics: Different Points of View", RFC 6703, DOI 10.17487/RFC6703, August 2012, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6703.

[RFC7015] Trammell, B., Wagner, A., and B. Claise, "Flow Aggregation for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol", RFC 7015, DOI 10.17487/RFC7015, September 2013, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7015.

[RFC7799] Morton, A., "Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (with Hybrid Types In-Between)", RFC 7799, DOI 10.17487/RFC7799, May 2016, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7799.

[RFC8754] Filsfils, C., Ed., Dukes, D., Ed., Previdi, S., Leddy, J., Matsushima, S., and D. Voyer, "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", RFC 8754, DOI 10.17487/RFC8754, March 2020, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8754.

[RFC9197] Brockners, F., Ed., Bhandari, S., Ed., and T. Mizrahi, Ed., "Data Fields for In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)", RFC 9197, DOI 10.17487/RFC9197, May 2022, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9197.

[RFC9232] Song, H., Qin, F., Martinez-Julia, P., Ciavaglia, L., and A. Wang, "Network Telemetry Framework", RFC 9232, DOI 10.17487/RFC9232, May 2022, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9232.

[RFC9326] Song, H., Gafni, B., Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., and T. Mizrahi, "In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Direct Exporting", RFC 9326, DOI 10.17487/RFC9326, November 2022, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9326.

[RFC9343] Fioccola, G., Zhou, T., Cociglio, M., Qin, F., and R. Pang, "IPv6 Application of the Alternate-Marking Method", RFC 9343, DOI 10.17487/RFC9343, December 2022, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9343.

[RFC9911] Schönwälder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 9911, DOI 10.17487/RFC9911, December 2025, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9911.

[RFC9947] Fioccola, G., Zhou, T., Mishra, G., Wang, X., Zhang, G., and M. Cociglio, "Application of the Alternate-Marking Method to the Segment Routing Header", RFC 9947, DOI 10.17487/RFC9947, March 2026, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9947.