8. 参考文献 (References)

本节列出 RFC 9948 的参考文献. 规范性引用包括 BCP 14 关键词规则, RFC 6919 中进一步的要求级别关键词, 以及 Protocol Police 相关文档. 这些引用为本文使用的幽默性或元规范性表达提供上下文, 也帮助读者区分哪些关键词具有正式规范含义.

资料性引用包含逻辑悖论, recidivism 研究, routing area morality sections 和 IANA Considerations 编写指南等背景材料. 这些条目主要用于说明本文的讽刺和背景语境. 文献题名, 作者, DOI, 页码和 URL 保持英文原样, 便于读者按正式书目信息检索.

8.1. 规范性参考文献 (Normative References)

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997.

[RFC6919] Barnes, R., Kent, S., and E. Rescorla, "Further Key Words for Use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", RFC 6919, DOI 10.17487/RFC6919, April 2013.

[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017.

[RFC8962] Grover, G., ten Oever, N., Cath, C., and S. Sahib, "Establishing the Protocol Police", RFC 8962, DOI 10.17487/RFC8962, April 2021.

8.2. 资料性参考文献 (Informative References)

[EPIMENIDES] Russell, B., "Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types", American Journal of Mathematics, Volume 30, Number 3, pages 222-262, July 1908.

[RECIDIVISM] Latzer, B., "Does the United States Have High Recidivism Rates? New Data Raise Questions About Prevailing Beliefs", DOI 10.2139/ssrn.5029176, 15 November 2024.

[RFC4041] Farrel, A., "Requirements for Morality Sections in Routing Area Drafts", RFC 4041, DOI 10.17487/RFC4041, April 2005.

[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017.