7. References
中文导读: 本节对应 RFC 9925 的 7. References 部分, 对应文档标题为 RFC 9925 - Unsigned X.509 Certificates. 下方若包含英文 RFC 原文, 注册表名称, 字段名, 算法名, 对象标识符, 媒体类型, 邮箱地址, URL, 代码, ABNF, ASN.1, YANG, JSON, XML, 测试向量或参考文献条目, 均按规范原样保留, 因为这些内容需要与 RFC 文本, IANA 注册表, 实现代码或验证工具逐字一致. 中文段落用于说明本节的作用, 阅读重点和实现含义, 不改变任何协议语义或注册值.
本节是参考文献清单, 主要用于标明规范性引用和资料性引用的来源. 引用标签, RFC 编号, BCP/STD 编号, DOI, URL, 作者姓名和英文题名均是可检索的书目信息, 因此保持英文或原始格式. 阅读正文时, 带有规范性要求的行为应回到被引用文档中确认; 资料性引用则提供背景, 算法, 部署经验或相关技术说明.
本节列出 RFC 9925 的规范性引用和资料性引用.
RFC 文本
7. 引用
7.1. 规范性引用
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.
[RFC5912] Hoffman, P. and J. Schaad, "New ASN.1 Modules for the
Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)", RFC 5912,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5912, June 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5912>.
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
7.2. 资料性引用
[JOSE] Madden, N., "JOSE: Deprecate 'none' and 'RSA1_5'", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-jose-deprecate-none-
rsa15-03, 19 September 2025,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-jose-
deprecate-none-rsa15-03>.
[JWT] Sanderson, J., "How Many Days Has It Been Since a JWT
alg:none Vulnerability?",
<https://www.howmanydayssinceajwtalgnonevuln.com/>.
[RFC4158] Cooper, M., Dzambasow, Y., Hesse, P., Joseph, S., and R.
Nicholas, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure:
Certification Path Building", RFC 4158,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4158, September 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4158>.
[RFC4514] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
(LDAP): String Representation of Distinguished Names",
RFC 4514, DOI 10.17487/RFC4514, June 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4514>.
[RFC5914] Housley, R., Ashmore, S., and C. Wallace, "Trust Anchor
Format", RFC 5914, DOI 10.17487/RFC5914, June 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5914>.
[RFC7299] Housley, R., "Object Identifier Registry for the PKIX
Working Group", RFC 7299, DOI 10.17487/RFC7299, July 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7299>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[X.509] ITU-T, "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - The Directory: Public-key and attribute
certificate frameworks", ITU-T Recommendation X.509, ISO/
IEC 9594-8:2020, October 2019,
<https://www.itu.int/rec/t-rec-x.509/en>.