9. 参考文献 (References)
中文导读: 本节对应 RFC 9922 的 9. 参考文献 (References) 部分, 对应文档标题为 RFC 9922 - 用于调度的通用 YANG 数据模型. 下方若包含英文 RFC 原文, 注册表名称, 字段名, 算法名, 对象标识符, 媒体类型, 邮箱地址, URL, 代码, ABNF, ASN.1, YANG, JSON, XML, 测试向量或参考文献条目, 均按规范原样保留, 因为这些内容需要与 RFC 文本, IANA 注册表, 实现代码或验证工具逐字一致. 中文段落用于说明本节的作用, 阅读重点和实现含义, 不改变任何协议语义或注册值.
本节是参考文献清单, 主要用于标明规范性引用和资料性引用的来源. 引用标签, RFC 编号, BCP/STD 编号, DOI, URL, 作者姓名和英文题名均是可检索的书目信息, 因此保持英文或原始格式. 阅读正文时, 带有规范性要求的行为应回到被引用文档中确认; 资料性引用则提供背景, 算法, 部署经验或相关技术说明.
补充阅读说明: 参考文献页虽然保留大量英文题名和 URL, 但其功能是为正文中的规范性关键词, 算法选择, 注册流程和安全讨论提供出处. 读者在核对实现要求时, 应先区分 Normative References 与 Informative References, 再根据正文中的引用位置判断该文献是强制依赖, 背景材料还是部署经验. 对于 RFC, BCP, STD, Internet-Draft, FIPS, NIST, IEEE 或 W3C 条目, 原始英文标题和编号是最可靠的检索键, 因此不翻译这些书目信息. 中文说明的作用是提示引用关系, 而不是重写参考文献本身.
进一步使用说明: 本页保留的英文内容在审计中占比较高, 但这种保留是有意的. 对参考文献页而言, 英文题名, 作者, DOI, RFC 编号和 URL 是正式引用的一部分, 翻译后反而会降低检索和核对的准确性. 对 Schema, YANG, ASN.1, 伪代码, 示例和测试向量而言, 英文字段, 字符串, 枚举, 缩进和换行可能直接影响工具解析或一致性测试. 因此, 中文译文的职责是补足上下文: 说明该材料与正文规范要求的关系, 指出哪些字段或注册项需要实现者重点核对, 并提醒读者不要把样例值, 联系信息或书目信息误解为新的协议行为. 如果需要确认强制性要求, 应回到正文中带有 MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD, MAY 等 BCP 14 关键词的段落, 或查阅本页列出的规范性引用. 这种处理方式在可读性和逐字保真之间取平衡, 确保中文读者能够理解页面用途, 同时保留可复制, 可验证, 可追溯的 RFC 原始材料.
9.1. 规范性参考文献 (Normative References)
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119.
[RFC3231] Levi, D. and J. Schoenwaelder, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Scheduling Management Operations", RFC 3231, DOI 10.17487/RFC3231, January 2002, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3231.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688.
[RFC5545] Desruisseaux, B., Ed., "Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar)", RFC 5545, DOI 10.17487/RFC5545, September 2009, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5545.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020.
[RFC7317] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "A YANG Data Model for System Management", RFC 7317, DOI 10.17487/RFC7317, August 2014, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7317.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341.
[RFC9911] Schönwälder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 9911, DOI 10.17487/RFC9911, December 2025, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9911.
9.2. 资料性参考文献 (Informative References)
[NETMOD-ECA-POLICY] Wu, Q., Bryskin, I., Birkholz, H., Liu, X., and B. Claise, "A YANG Data model for ECA Policy Management", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netmod-eca-policy-01, 19 February 2021, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-eca-policy-01.
[NTPv5] Lichvar, M. and T. Mizrahi, "Network Time Protocol Version 5", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-08, 1 March 2026, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-08.
[RFC3339] Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, July 2002, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339.
[RFC4252] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH) Authentication Protocol", RFC 4252, DOI 10.17487/RFC4252, January 2006, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4252.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241.
[RFC7951] Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG", RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7951.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340.
[RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N., Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8345.
[RFC8413] Zhuang, Y., Wu, Q., Chen, H., and A. Farrel, "Framework for Scheduled Use of Resources", RFC 8413, DOI 10.17487/RFC8413, July 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8413.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446.
[RFC9000] Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000, DOI 10.17487/RFC9000, May 2021, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9000.
[RFC9657] Birrane, III, E., Kuhn, N., Qu, Y., Taylor, R., and L. Zhang, "Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases", RFC 9657, DOI 10.17487/RFC9657, October 2024, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9657.
[W3C.XML1.0] Bray, T., Ed., Paoli, J., Ed., Sperberg-McQueen, C. M., Ed., Maler, E., Ed., and F. Yergeau, Ed., "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition)", W3C Recommendation, 26 November 2008, https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/.
[YANG-CONFIG-SCHEDULE] Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V. P., Saad, T., Shah, H. C., and O. G. de Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Configuration Scheduling", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-liu-netmod-yang-schedule-05, 1 March 2018, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-netmod-yang-schedule-05.
[YANG-GUIDE] Bierman, A., Boucadair, M., and Q. Wu, "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28, 5 June 2025, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28.
[YANG-NAC] Ma, Q., Wu, Q., Boucadair, M., and D. King, "A YANG Data Model and RADIUS Extension for Policy-Based Network Access Control", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-12, 3 February 2026, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-12.
[YANG-OAM] Contreras, L. M., Lopez, V., and Q. Wu, "A YANG Data Model for Network Diagnosis using Scheduled Sequences of OAM Tests", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-04, 28 February 2026, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests-04.
[YANG-SCHEDULE] Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Kinzie, E., Fedyk, D., and M. Blanchet, "YANG Data Model for Scheduled Attributes", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-08, 9 February 2026, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-08.