跳到主要内容

11. References (参考文献)

11. 参考文献 (References)​

本节列出 SRv6 网络编程规范使用的规范性和资料性参考文献. 规范性引用定义 Ethernet、IPv6 隧道、IPv6 Flow Label、IPv6 基础协议、Segment Routing 架构和 SRH. 资料性引用提供 ULA、BGP/MPLS VPN、L2VPN、VPLS、EVPN、IANA 指南、TI-LFA 和 SRv6 示例等背景. 英文标题、作者、DOI 和 URL 保持原文, 以便准确定位原始规范.

11.1. 规范性参考文献 (Normative References)​

这些文献定义 SRv6 数据平面必须依赖的基础行为, 包括 IPv6 包处理、Segment Routing Header、流标签和以太网封装语义.

[IEEE.802.3_2018]
IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Ethernet", IEEE 802.3-2018, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.8457469, 31 August 2018, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8457469.

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119.

[RFC2473]
Conta, A. and S. Deering, "Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6 Specification", RFC 2473, DOI 10.17487/RFC2473, December 1998, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2473.

[RFC6437]
Amante, S., Carpenter, B., Jiang, S., and J. Rajahalme, "IPv6 Flow Label Specification", RFC 6437, DOI 10.17487/RFC6437, November 2011, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6437.

[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174.

[RFC8200]
Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", STD 86, RFC 8200, DOI 10.17487/RFC8200, July 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200.

[RFC8402]
Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Ginsberg, L., Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing Architecture", RFC 8402, DOI 10.17487/RFC8402, July 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8402.

[RFC8754]
Filsfils, C., Ed., Dukes, D., Ed., Previdi, S., Leddy, J., Matsushima, S., and D. Voyer, "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", RFC 8754, DOI 10.17487/RFC8754, March 2020, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8754.

11.2. 资料性参考文献 (Informative References)​

这些文献提供部署和服务模型背景, 帮助读者理解 SRv6 网络编程如何与 VPN、EVPN、快速重路由和网络切片式转发行为结合.

SRv6 网络编程依赖 IPv6 数据平面的严格语义, 同时又服务于 VPN、EVPN 和快速重路由等运营场景. 因此, 规范性文献用于界定包格式和 SRH 行为, 资料性文献用于说明这些行为如何映射到实际服务. 实现者应将 SRv6 endpoint behavior、segment list、SRH 处理和底层 IPv6 转发规则结合起来阅读.

特别是, RFC 8402 和 RFC 8754 给出 Segment Routing 架构与 IPv6 Segment Routing Header 的核心定义; VPN 和 EVPN 相关引用说明 SRv6 如何承载已有服务模型; TI-LFA 和示例草案则帮助理解快速重路由和可编程路径的部署动机.

阅读顺序上, 可以先看 IPv6 和 SRH 相关规范, 再看 Segment Routing 架构, 最后看 VPN/EVPN 与快速重路由资料. 这样能先建立数据包处理模型, 再理解 SRv6 endpoint behavior 如何服务于更高层的业务编排.

本节仍保留大量英文书目信息, 是为了保证 IEEE、RFC Editor 和 Internet-Draft 条目可直接检索. 中文导读不替代引用条目, 只帮助读者判断哪些文献属于数据平面基础, 哪些属于服务承载和部署示例.

[RFC4193]
Hinden, R. and B. Haberman, "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", RFC 4193, DOI 10.17487/RFC4193, October 2005, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4193.

[RFC4364]
Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February 2006, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4364.

[RFC4664]
Andersson, L., Ed. and E. Rosen, Ed., "Framework for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (L2VPNs)", RFC 4664, DOI 10.17487/RFC4664, September 2006, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4664.

[RFC4761]
Kompella, K., Ed. and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling", RFC 4761, DOI 10.17487/RFC4761, January 2007, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4761.

[RFC4762]
Lasserre, M., Ed. and V. Kompella, Ed., "Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) Signaling", RFC 4762, DOI 10.17487/RFC4762, January 2007, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4762.

[RFC7432]
Sajassi, A., Ed., Aggarwal, R., Bitar, N., Isaac, A., Uttaro, J., Drake, J., and W. Henderickx, "BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN", RFC 7432, DOI 10.17487/RFC7432, February 2015, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7432.

[RFC8126]
Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126.

[RFC8214]
Boutros, S., Sajassi, A., Salam, S., Drake, J., and J. Rabadan, "Virtual Private Wire Service Support in Ethernet VPN", RFC 8214, DOI 10.17487/RFC8214, August 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8214.

[RFC8317]
Sajassi, A., Ed., Salam, S., Drake, J., Uttaro, J., Boutros, S., and J. Rabadan, "Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in Ethernet VPN (EVPN) and Provider Backbone Bridging EVPN (PBB-EVPN)", RFC 8317, DOI 10.17487/RFC8317, January 2018, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8317.

[SR-TI-LFA]
Litkowski, S., Bashandy, A., Filsfils, C., Francois, P., Decraene, B., and D. Voyer, "Topology Independent Fast Reroute using Segment Routing", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-06, 1 February 2021, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-06.

[SRV6-NET-PGM-ILLUST]
Filsfils, C., Camarillo, P., Ed., Li, Z., Matsushima, S., Decraene, B., Steinberg, D., Lebrun, D., Raszuk, R., and J. Leddy, "Illustrations for SRv6 Network Programming", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-net-pgm-illustration-03, 25 September 2020, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-net-pgm-illustration-03.