跳到主要内容

8.2 Informative References (信息性参考文献)

8.2 Informative References (信息性参考文献)​

本节列出本文档引用的规范性和信息性参考文献. 为保持引用可核验性, 文献条目的作者姓名, 英文题名, 出版物名称, RFC 编号, DOI, URL 和日期等元数据按原文保留. 中文说明用于标明这些条目是协议规范, 标准文档, 实现资料或背景资料, 读者可据此追溯原始来源.

资料性参考文献说明 Path MTU Discovery 的历史、风险和替代方法. 其中 IPv4 PMTUD、旧版 IPv6 PMTUD、Packetization Layer PMTUD、ICMPv6 防火墙过滤建议、UDP/SCTP/NFS/TCP MSS 等文献, 用于解释为什么路径 MTU 发现需要兼顾可靠 ICMPv6 反馈、黑洞检测和上层协议行为.

这些资料不一定直接规定 RFC 8201 的强制行为, 但对部署排障非常有帮助. 例如, TCP PMTUD 问题和 ICMPv6 过滤建议能解释为什么过度过滤 Packet Too Big 消息会破坏 IPv6 连通性.

运营人员也可以利用这些引用区分不同层次的问题: 链路 MTU 与 IPv6 最小 MTU 属于网络层约束, TCP MSS 和 UDP usage 属于传输或应用行为, PLPMTUD 则提供在 ICMP 反馈不可靠时的补充探测方法. 这些背景能帮助定位黑洞连接、过大分组丢弃和防火墙误过滤.

[FRAG]
Kent, C. and J. Mogul, "Fragmentation Considered Harmful", In Proc. SIGCOMM '87 Workshop on Frontiers in Computer Communications Technology, DOI 10.1145/55483.55524, August 1987.

[ND]
Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman, "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861, DOI 10.17487/RFC4861, September 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4861>.

[RFC1122]
Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, DOI 10.17487/RFC1122, October 1989, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1122>.

[RFC1191]
Mogul, J. and S. Deering, "Path MTU discovery", RFC 1191, DOI 10.17487/RFC1191, November 1990, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1191>.

[RFC1981]
McCann, J., Deering, S., and J. Mogul, "Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6", RFC 1981, DOI 10.17487/RFC1981, August 1996, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1981>.

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

[RFC2923]
Lahey, K., "TCP Problems with Path MTU Discovery", RFC 2923, DOI 10.17487/RFC2923, September 2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2923>.

[RFC4340]
Kohler, E., Handley, M., and S. Floyd, "Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)", RFC 4340, DOI 10.17487/RFC4340, March 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4340>.

[RFC4821]
Mathis, M. and J. Heffner, "Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery", RFC 4821, DOI 10.17487/RFC4821, March 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4821>.

[RFC4890]
Davies, E. and J. Mohacsi, "Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in Firewalls", RFC 4890, DOI 10.17487/RFC4890, May 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4890>.

[RFC4960]
Stewart, R., Ed., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 4960, DOI 10.17487/RFC4960, September 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4960>.

[RFC6691]
Borman, D., "TCP Options and Maximum Segment Size (MSS)", RFC 6691, DOI 10.17487/RFC6691, July 2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6691>.

[RFC7530]
Haynes, T., Ed. and D. Noveck, Ed., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol", RFC 7530, DOI 10.17487/RFC7530, March 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7530>.

[RFC8085]
Eggert, L., Fairhurst, G., and G. Shepherd, "UDP Usage Guidelines", BCP 145, RFC 8085, DOI 10.17487/RFC8085, March 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8085>.