跳到主要内容

8.2 Informative References (信息性参考文献)

8.2 Informative References (信息性参考文献)

本节列出本文档引用的规范性和信息性参考文献. 为保持引用可核验性, 文献条目的作者姓名, 英文题名, 出版物名称, RFC 编号, DOI, URL 和日期等元数据按原文保留. 中文说明用于标明这些条目是协议规范, 标准文档, 实现资料或背景资料, 读者可据此追溯原始来源.

资料性参考文献说明 Path MTU Discovery 的历史、风险和替代方法. 其中 IPv4 PMTUD、旧版 IPv6 PMTUD、Packetization Layer PMTUD、ICMPv6 防火墙过滤建议、UDP/SCTP/NFS/TCP MSS 等文献, 用于解释为什么路径 MTU 发现需要兼顾可靠 ICMPv6 反馈、黑洞检测和上层协议行为.

这些资料不一定直接规定 RFC 8201 的强制行为, 但对部署排障非常有帮助. 例如, TCP PMTUD 问题和 ICMPv6 过滤建议能解释为什么过度过滤 Packet Too Big 消息会破坏 IPv6 连通性.

运营人员也可以利用这些引用区分不同层次的问题: 链路 MTU 与 IPv6 最小 MTU 属于网络层约束, TCP MSS 和 UDP usage 属于传输或应用行为, PLPMTUD 则提供在 ICMP 反馈不可靠时的补充探测方法. 这些背景能帮助定位黑洞连接、过大分组丢弃和防火墙误过滤.

[FRAG]
Kent, C. and J. Mogul, "Fragmentation Considered Harmful", In Proc. SIGCOMM '87 Workshop on Frontiers in Computer Communications Technology, DOI 10.1145/55483.55524, August 1987.

[ND]
Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman, "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861, DOI 10.17487/RFC4861, September 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4861>.

[RFC1122]
Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, DOI 10.17487/RFC1122, October 1989, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1122>.

[RFC1191]
Mogul, J. and S. Deering, "Path MTU discovery", RFC 1191, DOI 10.17487/RFC1191, November 1990, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1191>.

[RFC1981]
McCann, J., Deering, S., and J. Mogul, "Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6", RFC 1981, DOI 10.17487/RFC1981, August 1996, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1981>.

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

[RFC2923]
Lahey, K., "TCP Problems with Path MTU Discovery", RFC 2923, DOI 10.17487/RFC2923, September 2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2923>.

[RFC4340]
Kohler, E., Handley, M., and S. Floyd, "Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)", RFC 4340, DOI 10.17487/RFC4340, March 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4340>.

[RFC4821]
Mathis, M. and J. Heffner, "Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery", RFC 4821, DOI 10.17487/RFC4821, March 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4821>.

[RFC4890]
Davies, E. and J. Mohacsi, "Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in Firewalls", RFC 4890, DOI 10.17487/RFC4890, May 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4890>.

[RFC4960]
Stewart, R., Ed., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 4960, DOI 10.17487/RFC4960, September 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4960>.

[RFC6691]
Borman, D., "TCP Options and Maximum Segment Size (MSS)", RFC 6691, DOI 10.17487/RFC6691, July 2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6691>.

[RFC7530]
Haynes, T., Ed. and D. Noveck, Ed., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol", RFC 7530, DOI 10.17487/RFC7530, March 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7530>.

[RFC8085]
Eggert, L., Fairhurst, G., and G. Shepherd, "UDP Usage Guidelines", BCP 145, RFC 8085, DOI 10.17487/RFC8085, March 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8085>.