7. 参考文献 (References)
本节列出 PIM-SM 规范使用的规范性和资料性参考文献. 规范性引用定义组播主机行为,IGMPv3,MLD,IPv6,Source-Specific Multicast,地址族编号,PIM-SM 链路本地消息认证以及 IANA 考虑事项写作规则. 资料性引用提供 BGP 多协议扩展,BSR,隧道差分服务,BIDIR-PIM 和 PIM 安全威胁等背景.
7.1. 规范性参考文献 (Normative References)
这些条目是理解和实现 PIM-SM 必需的基础. 它们定义了组成员关系,组播地址族,IPv6 语义和安全保护机制.
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119.
[2] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A. Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3", RFC 3376, DOI 10.17487/RFC3376, October 2002, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3376.
[3] Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", STD 5, RFC 1112, DOI 10.17487/RFC1112, August 1989, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1112.
[4] Deering, S., Fenner, W., and B. Haberman, "Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6", RFC 2710, DOI 10.17487/RFC2710, October 1999, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2710.
[5] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, DOI 10.17487/RFC2460, December 1998, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2460.
[6] Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for IP", RFC 4607, DOI 10.17487/RFC4607, August 2006, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4607.
[7] IANA, "Address Family Numbers", http://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers.
[8] Atwood, W., Islam, S., and M. Siami, "Authentication and Confidentiality in Protocol Independent Multicast Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) Link-Local Messages", RFC 5796, DOI 10.17487/RFC5796, March 2010, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5796.
[9] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226.
7.2. 资料性参考文献 (Informative References)
这些条目用于补充部署和安全背景. 它们帮助读者理解 PIM-SM 与 BGP,BSR,BIDIR-PIM,隧道处理和组播路由安全之间的关系.
PIM-SM 的正确实现依赖组播接收者发现,源特定组播,IPv6 地址族和链路本地消息安全等多个基础组件. 规范性引用提供这些组件的协议定义, 资料性引用则说明在跨域路由,Bootstrap Router,双向 PIM,隧道差分服务和安全威胁方面的相关经验. 对运营者而言, 这些文献有助于判断何时需要额外的认证,过滤或路由策略.
[10] Bates, T., Chandra, R., Katz, D., and Y. Rekhter, "Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4", RFC 4760, DOI 10.17487/RFC4760, January 2007, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4760.
[11] Bhaskar, N., Gall, A., Lingard, J., and S. Venaas, "Bootstrap Router (BSR) Mechanism for Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM)", RFC 5059, DOI 10.17487/RFC5059, January 2008, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5059.
[12] Black, D., "Differentiated Services and Tunnels", RFC 2983, DOI 10.17487/RFC2983, October 2000, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2983.
[13] Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano, "Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-PIM)", RFC 5015, DOI 10.17487/RFC5015, October 2007, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5015.
[14] Savola, P., Lehtonen, R., and D. Meyer, "Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) Multicast Routing Security Issues and Enhancements", RFC 4609, DOI 10.17487/RFC4609, October 2006, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4609.
[15] Savola, P. and J. Lingard, "Host Threats to Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM)", RFC 5294, DOI 10.17487/RFC5294, August 2008, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5294.