Appendix A. Comparison with RFC 1771
Appendix A. Comparison with RFC 1771
There are numerous editorial changes in comparison to [RFC1771] (too many to list here).
The following list the technical changes:
Changes to reflect the usage of features such as TCP MD5 [RFC2385], BGP Route Reflectors [RFC2796], BGP Confederations [RFC3065], and BGP Route Refresh [RFC2918].
Clarification of the use of the BGP Identifier in the AGGREGATOR attribute.
Procedures for imposing an upper bound on the number of prefixes that a BGP speaker would accept from a peer.
The ability of a BGP speaker to include more than one instance of its own AS in the AS_PATH attribute for the purpose of inter-AS traffic engineering.
Clarification of the various types of NEXT_HOPs.
Clarification of the use of the ATOMIC_AGGREGATE attribute.
The relationship between the immediate next hop, and the next hop as specified in the NEXT_HOP path attribute.
Clarification of the tie-breaking procedures.
Clarification of the frequency of route advertisements.
Optional Parameter Type 1 (Authentication Information) has been deprecated.
UPDATE Message Error subcode 7 (AS Routing Loop) has been deprecated.
OPEN Message Error subcode 5 (Authentication Failure) has been deprecated.
Use of the Marker field for authentication has been deprecated.
Implementations MUST support TCP MD5 [RFC2385] for authentication.
Clarification of BGP FSM.
RFC 4271 BGP-4 January 2006