Zum Hauptinhalt springen

11. References

Dieser Abschnitt bewahrt den RFC-Text fuer ML-KEM in PKIX, einschliesslich algorithm identifiers, SubjectPublicKeyInfo, private key formats, ASN.1 objects, security considerations und examples.

11.  References

11.1.  Normative References

   [CSOR]     NIST, "Computer Security Objects Register (CSOR)", 13 June
              2025, <https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/computer-security-
              objects-register/algorithm-registration>.

   [FIPS203]  NIST, "Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism
              Standard", NIST FIPS 203, DOI 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203,
              August 2024, <https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/
              NIST.FIPS.203.pdf>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC5280]  Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
              Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
              Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
              (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.

   [RFC5912]  Hoffman, P. and J. Schaad, "New ASN.1 Modules for the
              Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)", RFC 5912,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5912, June 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5912>.

   [RFC5958]  Turner, S., "Asymmetric Key Packages", RFC 5958,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5958, August 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5958>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC9629]  Housley, R., Gray, J., and T. Okubo, "Using Key
              Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM) Algorithms in the
              Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 9629,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9629, August 2024,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9629>.

   [X680]     ITU-T, "Information technology - Abstract Syntax Notation
              One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation", ITU-T
              Recommendation X.680, ISO/IEC 8824-1:2021, February 2021,
              <https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.680>.

   [X690]     ITU-T, "Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
              Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical
              Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules
              (DER)", ITU-T Recommendation X.690, ISO/IEC 8825-1:2021,
              February 2021, <https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.690>.

11.2.  Informative References

   [CDM23]    Cremers, C., Dax, A., and N. Medinger, "Keeping Up with
              the KEMs: Stronger Security Notions for KEMs and automated
              analysis of KEM-based protocols", Cryptology ePrint
              Archive, Paper 2023/1933, 2023,
              <https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1933.pdf>.

   [KEM-TLS]  Wiggers, T., Celi, S., Schwabe, P., Stebila, D., and N.
              Sullivan, "KEM-based Authentication for TLS 1.3", Work in
              Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-celi-wiggers-tls-authkem-
              06, 4 November 2025,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-celi-wiggers-
              tls-authkem-06>.

   [KEMMY24]  Schmieg, S., "Unbindable Kemmy Schmidt: ML-KEM is neither
              MAL-BIND-K-CT nor MAL-BIND-K-PK", Cryptology ePrint
              Archive, Paper 2024/523, 2024,
              <https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/523.pdf>.

   [ML-KEM-SEC-CONS]
              Fluhrer, S., Dang, Q., Mattsson, J. P., Milner, K., and D.
              Shiu, "ML-KEM Security Considerations", Work in Progress,
              Internet-Draft, draft-sfluhrer-cfrg-ml-kem-security-
              considerations-04, 17 November 2025,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sfluhrer-
              cfrg-ml-kem-security-considerations-04>.

   [NIST-PQC] NIST, "Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)", 28 July 2025,
              <https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-
              cryptography>.

   [RFC7468]  Josefsson, S. and S. Leonard, "Textual Encodings of PKIX,
              PKCS, and CMS Structures", RFC 7468, DOI 10.17487/RFC7468,
              April 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7468>.

   [RFC9881]  Massimo, J., Kampanakis, P., Turner, S., and B. E.
              Westerbaan, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure --
              Algorithm Identifiers for the Module-Lattice-Based Digital
              Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA)", RFC 9881,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9881, October 2025,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9881>.

   [RFC9936]  Prat, J., Ounsworth, M., and D. Van Geest, "Use of ML-KEM
              in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 9936,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9936, March 2026,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9936>.
Letztes Update am